This post is in response to this article at

 Reminder: Exit-Poll Conspiracy Theories Are Totally Baseless Voters have good reason to lack confidence in our election systems. But claims of widespread fraud aren’t going to fix anything

Sadly, this author does not understand the math well enough to realize that, despite the protests of the professional pollster interviewed, claims of widespread fraud are not baseless. Exit poll results for the democratic presidential primary provide not one but two solid pieces of evidence in the case for widespread election fraud.

We have a voting system, as he acknowledges, that gives us no cause for confidence that our voting results are accurately assessed. Despite this, he claims that there is no cause for concern. I disagree as I find multiple independent paths of analyses give evidence that consistently points to massive widespread election fraud across our country.

My specialty is statistics and I’ve pulled down publicly available data independently, analyzed it myself, and corroborated analyses which points to massive widespread election fraud. Mr. Holland disparages the mathematical work of Richard Charnin*, but I have not found an error in any of the analyses of his that I have repeated.

In particular, his assessment of the binomial probability regarding the likelihood of the exit poll results, is both accurate and appropriate. I have verified it myself. This binomial analysis was ignored by Mr. Holland in favor of criticizing a different approach that was also used. That approach is also sound, but I have not reproduced those calculations. That both models show results that are consistent with the hypothesis of election fraud is more than doubly damning.

If we assume no election fraud, then the two different types of analysis of the exit poll errors are unrelated because one analysis looks at the size of the error while the other is based on whether it benefited Hillary versus Bernie. That they are both consistent with fraud could be considered a third piece of evidence in support of that hypothesis.

The excuses Mr. Lenski, Edison’s executive vice president is quoted as providing are specious with regard to the magnitude of the anomalies we are seeing. Yes, there are issues that can lead to inherent problems due the different ways they performed the surveys. No, those reasons are not sufficient to explain the anomalies we are seeing across the country.

There are only two possibilities – a) Bernie supporters are more likely to respond to the poll or b) there is widespread election fraud altering election results in favor of Hillary across the U.S.

While we can never completely eliminate reason a, Mr. Lenski’s excuse is no more than a restatement of that first hypothesis while he notes that there is a a lower response rate (how much lower?) for the more detailed surveys conducted in the U.S. While it’s easy for the mathematically naive to infer causality from his statement, that isn’t automatically the case. Further, it’s not an assumption that should be made without explicitly stating it**.

So which do you think is more likely across the U.S.: Are Bernie voters just more civic-minded and willing to participate in exit polls than Hillary voters or is some well-organized group of wealthy individuals able to successfully conspire to fix voting machines across the nation or are multiple independent local political actors across the country taking advantage of the non-transparent hackable voting systems?

While you contemplate those options and estimate the probability of the first hypothesis with respect to the last two, let me review some of the additional evidence in support of the hypothesis of fraud.

Cumulative Vote Share (CVS) analysis pioneered by Francis Choquette shows problems across the nation for the past decade or more. Interestingly enough, places that use hand counted ballots do not show the same trends and within a state, analyzing by machine can show sharply different trends for different equipment. Such analysis shows trends that are indicative of rigging that favors Hillary

The apparent ease of hacking electronic voting machines combined with the prevalence of election rigging through-out the world and human history.

Lack of basic quality control procedures: In most locations in the U.S., no one – not officials and not citizens – actually verify the official vote counts. Canvassing becomes a sham that involves verifying that yes, the machine produced outcomes all add up to the machine produced totals. In those places where the count was supposed to be publicly verified, citizens watching report blatant miscounting to force a match to the “official results”. Their testimony to election commissioners about such actions were met with a blank stare followed by dismissal of their testimony.

I live in Kansas, home of Koch Industries and currently the reddest of red states with all public schools across the state on the verge of closing the end of this month. IMO these problems are due to election fraud. I believe the Governor, Senator Roberts, and most of the KS legislature would not have won in 2014 if a fair and honest vote count had been done.

I do not make that statement lightly. I hold a Ph.D. in statistics and have been certified as a Quality Engineer for nearly 30 years. I’ve gone to the extreme of filing a lawsuit requesting access to the voting machine records to verify those election results. So far, I haven’t been allowed access.

A few questions for Mr. Holland: Did you spontaneously decide to write about this? A reaction to a disparaging blog regarding a previous piece saying “don’t worry, the theater is NOT on fire” vis-a-vis election fraud. Or was it suggested? Assigned? Did your publisher encourage you to disparage these claims, despite your lack of expertise to regarding either surveys or statistics. Would a favorable opinion piece regarding such claims have been published?

Mr Holland, you have not done the analysis for yourself. You base your opinion of its significance on the expert opinion you trust – Mr. Lenski, an executive of the polling company. My response is that I have looked into this deeply and I trust my own expert opinion on this matter. It is a justifiable conclusion that widespread election fraud is going on in this country. The Theater is on fire. We need to take care of this problem now!

The fix, btw, is both easy and impossible. All we have to do is demand a transparent and accurate vote count from our election officials.

*He disparages him for writing about the murder of JFK. Is it really foolish to think that someone besides Lee Harvey Oswald was involved in that?

**It’s also a testable assumption, but Mr. Lenski’s firm is the only entity with access to the data to do the test.

Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/cnva1u0um55q/domains/ on line 405

13 thoughts on “THE THEATER IS ON FIRE!”

  1. The people who want us to dismiss the exit-poll discrepancies as being just some kind of “fluke”, need to explain why the discrepancies never happen where there is manual counting of votes. That is pretty suspicious and there is no good explanation other than election fraud. We who say the theatre is on fire are not just imagining things, we are choking and coughing from smoke that is also in our eyes and it is difficult to see across the room, there is so much smoke.

  2. 1) Simon, in his book ‘Code Red etc’ indicates that the statistical
    conjecturing that he and may of us election integrity activists
    have done or have seen over many years could be seen as
    “statistical punditry”.

    2) Have been an observer of ‘election returns’ on election
    night …. a) assuming only two candidates running for an
    office and you convert the total from each precinct into
    a percentage graph you will observe a positive shift for
    candidate A and a negative shift for candidate B. These
    shifts will not prove an error or fraud.

    3) The comparison some election integrity activists fall
    into is they will compare official reported counts v/s
    un-official exit polls…. will be seen by a judge/court as
    mere statistical punditry, conjecture, etc. …..
    If you can bring real numbers to a judge/court such as official
    count reports v/s a court ordered hand count or testimony
    from witnesses that error and/or fraud has/is occurring…. you
    will give a judge/court a case they can adjudicate…etc.

    By the way when one looks at the 30 Full Voting Rights for
    each and every voter…. you will find meat for a case you can
    bring to a judge/court…etc.

    Thanks and Good Luck, Frank Henry, Tel: 928-649-0249,…

  3. Beth Clarkson, you are heroic. Just wonderful. I love all election integrity people, so great.

    I just found an interview made today of Bob Fitrakis updating information about his and Cliff Arnebeck’s RICO suit and California.
    6-10-16 Nicole Sandler Show – Election Integrity – Fact or Fraud?
    Bob Fitrakis on The Nicole Sandler Show
    Nicole Sandler

    54:10 on video, a small segment and a rough transcript below:

    Update: The RICO lawsuit has not yet been filed.

    Originally, attorneys Cliff Arnebeck and Bob Fitrakis were going to file their RICO lawsuit earlier on June 6th in order to get the networks to release the raw data on exit polls for the California primary. The networks cancelled the exit polls instead.

    The RICO suit will be filed. The problem is they ran into a huge problems in California.

    With the donations they are getting, Arnebeck and Fitrakis are beefing up legal staff.

    California, if it were a nation would be the eight largest nation on earth, had some of the most massive irregularities. Fitrakis said he was getting emails constantly from poll workers and election observers saying 25% of people in my precinct were forced to vote provisionally.

    Systematic problems with registration being wrong, people showed up saying they had registered to vote in the Democrat primary, but instead were registered as being in other parties which meant that they could not vote for a presidential candidate.

    Fitrakis said, we did some limited exit polling ourselves and those numbers are being crunched.

    The lawsuits and it looks like there may be two of them: the initial one over getting the exit polls and also a second one getting discovery for criminal activity which is the one that should go first, be filed first.

    But California had massive levels of irregularities and what looks like outright fraud. Most of California should be roped off as a crime scene. it happened deliberately from party loyalists and private corporations.

    California has delayed us somewhat and caused us to beef up legal staff. He says they will be filing next week.

    To repeat the election lawyers Cliff Arnebeck and Bob Fitrakis first video announcing the RICO suit:
    See the short video:


    Bob Fitrakis, Cliff Arnebeck and Lori Grace

    Rough summary: In addition to filing a RICO racketeering lawsuit against a complicit media who adjusted exit polls they were conducting to match the fraudulent voting machine counts/tabulations, Attorneys Cliff Arnebeck and Bob Fitrakis are suing the voting machine companies for the crime of fraud as the code that Bev Harris found was fractionalizing votes, and changing outcomes.

    And, in the same RICO video, Cliff Arnebeck says this is a Very Strong RICO lawsuit involving State and Federal Courts, involving current and past election crimes, that importantly involves ALL THE STATES for the collection of additional evidence, discovery, to determine the correct vote counts, and delegate counts precinct by precinct from this primary.

    Cliff Arnebeck says that by the time of the Republican Convention which is before the Democratic Convention, that this RICO racketeering lawsuit will have changed history, and the minds of politicians and the voting public so that the true winner, Bernie Sanders, will be nominated.

    Since Cliff Arnebeck is the same lawyer who prevented fraud from occurring in Ohio in 2012 which would have given Romney the Presidency, Obama owes his Presidency to Arnebeck. Since the FBI were involved with Arnebeck’s successful effort to prevent fraud, Carl Rove did not get a heads up about the election not being fixed as the voting machine owners could not call him for fear of FBI wiretaps. So Carl had a meltdown on TV.

    These lawyers have a history of success. I believe they will win. I believe we are on the verge of rescuing our democracy. If you want to donate to their efforts go to or

    Oh, and about Richard Charnin getting any flack over JFK, return that flack, because the truth is needed to keep Bernie Sanders safe:

    Democratic Primaries: Is Clinton leading by 3 million votes?
    Richard Charnin

    In comments:
    The two subjects–election fraud and the assassination of JFK–have a deep common link, the undoing of a democracy where people’s votes and the leaders they voted for, are removed by way of a coup. A link so important that it bears mentioning before California, in case Bernie and his supporters can overrun the fraud that has been built into this primary election. (or after the effectiveness of a RICO racketeering lawsuit to recover our Democracy)


    This is the article that informed me that the intelligence agencies, backed by corporations profiting from privatizing resources, spying, war, are owners of those fraudulent evidence-removed e-voting, e-scanning, e-tabulating machines:

    Who owns Scytl? George Soros isn’t in the voting machines, but the intelligence community is
by Gerry Bello

    In 2010, Scytl purchased a 100% interest in SOE software, an up and coming player in the American elections market with their Clarity Software Suite which is used in 525 jurisdictions in 19 states. SOE has a strategic partnership with ES & S, the major marketer of electronic voting systems in the US. ES & S was sued by the US DOJ in 2009 on anti-trust grounds after purchasing Diebold’s elections division, Premier Election Solutions. ES & S subsequently sold Premier to rival manufacturer Dominion. Bob Urosevich, founder of ES & S, was also President of Diebold. In 2006 Urosevich was listed as managing director of Scytl Americas, although his name has subsequently been removed from their website.

    The same companies being RICOed for the crime of fraud.

    Get ready to SUPPORT and PROTECT Bernie Sanders.

    Bushs are CIA, perhaps Obama, Trump and the Clintons are too, since they do not correct the fraud in the voting machines that they are benefiting from, nor do they disclose last documentation on JFK (now the Bush’s Carlyle group owns the JFK Library, ).

    And, the CIA is not better than a Democracy. They should not be deciding our future. Perhaps they think it is kinder, gentler to select presidents rather than eliminate our best leaders:

    Miami Jury: CIA Involved in JFK Assassination
    By The Spotlight Global Research, May 01, 2014

    Not a single major newspaper nor any national news broadcast has ever reported that on Feb. 6, 1985, a jury in Miami concluded that the CIA was involved in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

    This is remarkable, if only because the verdict came in a court case featuring two international celebrities: Water gate burglar E. Howard Hunt — perhaps the most infamous CIA operative in history — and his courtroom nemesis — attorney Mark Lane. Lane’s ground-break ing best-seller, Rush to Judgment, had convinced millions of readers there had been a conspiracy in the JFK assassination, the Warren Commission’s claims notwithstanding.

    Scattered news reports did mention Hunt had lost a libel case against The SPOTLIGHT. However, no media reported what the jury forewoman had told the press:

    Mr. Lane was asking us to do something very difficult. He was asking us to believe John Kennedy had been killed by our own government. Yet when we examined the evidence closely, we were compelled to conclude that the CIA had indeed killed President Kennedy.

    Until 1992, when Lane recounted the trial in Plausible Denial and put forth additional compelling evidence of CIA complicity in the crime, the only substantive news reports about the trial appeared in The SPOTLIGHT. In issue No. 7 for 1985 (Feb. 18), The SPOTLIGHT announced its victory, detailing the remarkable events that led to the trial.

    The affair was set in motion on Aug. 14, 1978, when The SPOTLIGHT published an article by former CIA official Victor Marchetti who revealed the CIA intended to publicly “admit” Hunt had been involved in the JFK assassination, acting as a “rogue” agent without CIA sanction.

    A top CIA liaison to anti-Castro Cuban exiles in the early 1960s, Hunt was unknown to the public until the Watergate scandal that toppled President Nixon in 1974 brought Hunt ill fame. Then, after Watergate, when the Rockefeller Commission investigated CIA misdeeds, two eccentric writers alleged Hunt was one of three “tramps” photographed in Dallas minutes after the JFK assassination.

    Subsequent investigation refuted the “Hunt as tramp” theory. However, scandal sheets had hyped the story and many came to believe Hunt had a hand in Dallas.

    In 1976, growing skepticism about the Warren Commission’s claim that a “lone assassin” had killed JFK forced the House of Representatives to convene a new assassination inquiry.

    In the midst of the House investigation, an unusual development occurred:

    As Marchetti’s SPOTLIGHT article reported, an in-house CIA memo, ostensibly written in 1966 — some 12 years previously — was leaked to congressional investigators.

    The memo stated Hunt had been in Dallas on the day of the JFK assassination, and that CIA officials were concerned the agency would one day have to explain Hunt’s presence there.

    The SPOTLIGHT subsequently learned CIA Director Richard Helms and the CIA’s chief of counterintelligence, James Angleton, had signed off on the memo.

    Marchetti suggested that because the CIA perceived Hunt to be a villain in the public’s eye as a consequence of Watergate, the CIA had decided to sacrifice Hunt and “admit” he had been involved in the assassination.


    Coretta Scott King: “We have done what we can to reveal the truth, and we now urge you as members of the media, and we call upon elected officials, and other persons of influence to do what they can to share the revelation of this case to the widest possible audience.” – King Family Press Conference, Dec. 9, 1999.

    Dr. Martin Luther King’s family and personal friend/attorney, William F. Pepper, won a civil trial that found US government agencies guilty of Martin’s assassination/wrongful death. The 1999 trial, King Family versus Jowers and Other Unknown Co-Conspirators, is the only trial ever conducted on the assassination of Dr. King. The King Center fully documents the case, ( ) with full trial transcript (to more fully explain the following summary of trial evidence, here is the best article I’ve found: How the Government Killed Martin Luther King, Jr. By Kevin Barrett ).

    We have to save Bernie, kids, democracy and our future as a species.

    If we cannot prevail over this coup, then Gene Sharp’s writings and strategies have already worked in several countries. And, Gene Sharp is so well respected and mainstream that there is an annual Gene Sharp Day in Boston Mass. for him:

    Gene Sharp’s online book:
    From Dictatorship to Democracy: A Conceptual Framework for Liberation
    see the index for
    over 200 nonviolent actions to construct positive change toward a democracy.

    Become a supporter — 20 days left
    Albert Einstein Institution
    Advancing freedom through nonviolent action


    Support and Protect Bernie Sanders. Support and Protect Our Democracy.

  4. Hi Dael, I do believe these are hopeful times. I do think this RICO suit will prevail.

    Spread the word and Donate to Trust Vote to rescue our democracy with Cliff Arnebeck’s and Bob Fitrakis’s RICO lawsuit against fraudulent voting machine companies and a complicit media for forcing exit polls to match voting machine fraud:


    Bob Fitrakis, Cliff Arnebeck and Lori Grace

    And, please consider Donating to Gene Sharp who is also rescuing democracies all over the world, and we may need his help here in America if the RICO suit does not prevail.

    Become a supporter — 16 days left

    pledged per month of our $8,000 goal



    This year, three of our largest donors have suffered misfortunes beyond their control. Without their support, we have lost the majority of our annual income, and we will not be able to sustain our operations through the summer.

    At the same time our work is in greater demand than ever. We are receiving requests for our workshops, consultations, and publications from activists throughout the world on a daily basis–from pro-democracy groups in the Congo to anti-corruption activists in Brazil and those working to put an end to violence in Yemen and many, many more.

    We have also been active in promoting strategic nonviolent action among new audiences. Last month we held our first extensive workshop for top climate change activists in the United States, and just last week, our Executive Director, Jamila Raqib’s, official TED Talk premiered on PBS. See:

    And, the worst part is, those who are abusing human rights throughout the world would love nothing better than for us to close our doors. Today in Angola, fifteen young people are serving jail sentences of between five to eight years just for reading our books. Our work in particular is being targeted by many authoritarian regimes throughout the world.

    Needless to say–we can’t let them win.

    We are hoping that enough people like you will get behind our mission and help to save this Institution. For the first time in our 33-year history, we are asking individuals to become ongoing supporters by making monthly pledges (of $5 or more). This is the kind of grassroots support that can make our work succeed. As you will see below, we are offering a variety of gifts to show our gratitude for your support.

    Monthly Donations Levels and Thank-You Gifts:

    Large Gifts
    We invite you to contact our Executive Director, Jamila Raqib, if you wish to discuss a larger contribution.
    Jamila Raqib
    (617) 247-4882
    Or you may mail a check payable to:
    Albert Einstein Institution
    P.O. Box 455
    East Boston, MA 02128

  5. CHART: Foundations that Fund Left-Wing Media
    Support a 100% People-Funded Online News Outlet, Phase 1
    by Sibel Edmonds

    Get Rid of Those Voting Machines. Another major reason that we need our Democracy back from those controlling the voting machines, as if privatization of all public resources, economic fraud draining the middle class, working class and poor, spying and endless war weren’t enough reason:


    You have to ask yourself why would those controlling the voting machines and so therefore, the votes, ever put into high power, someone like Dennis Hastert, pedophile, now convicted criminal with crimes against the state and crimes against kids, who was heading a subcommittee on protecting kids, and who rose to be Speaker of the House, the third most powerful politician in the line of succession. Why? It’s been going on a long time. Again, look who owns those machines.

    by: Charles M. Young

    Still Evil after All These Years: The Franklin Scandal and Pedophilia in High Places
By Charles M. Young Posted by Dave Lindorff

    The Omaha World-Herald was the foremost local cheerleader for persecuting teenagers instead of investigating their claims. One of its own columnists, Peter Citron, had a long history of arrests for pedophilia and child porn and was implicated by two witnesses at Larry King’s sex parties. The long-time publisher of the World-Herald, Harold Anderson, was a big supporter of Larry King and had raised money for the Franklin. During the 18 years that King presided over the Franklin, the newspaper never noticed that King was living a hugely expensive lifestyle when he was supposedly making $17,000 a year in salary. The World-Herald Company is co-owner of Election Software and Systems (also known as ES & S and associated with Diebold and more), which counts half the election ballots in the United States.

    Americans have plenty of obvious reasons to hate the rich and powerful. Wars for oil, rampant pollution, the destruction of individual rights, the constant lying about everything. It’s all on the front page, and it’s like old furniture in the living room. It’s hard for most people to notice. Boutique evil of the Gerry Sandusky sort affects fewer victims, but is more easily understood once the initial denial breaks down. If the denial of the Franklin Credit Union scandal ever breaks down, the consequences will reverberate far higher than happened at Penn State. Except for all those who died in suspicious accidents and suicides, the witnesses are still out there. Some might even talk about it. They talked to Nick Bryant.

    THE FRANKLIN SCANDAL: A Story of Powerbrokers, Child Abuse & Betrayal

    by Nick Bryant

    The FRANKLIN SCANDAL is the story of a nationwide pedophile ring that 
pandered children to a cabal of the rich and powerful. The ring’s pimps were a pair of political powerbrokers who had access to the highest levels of our government. Nebraska legislators attempted to expose the network in 1989 and 1990, but the legislators’ efforts were followed by a rash of mysterious deaths and the overpowering responses of federal and local law enforcement, including the FBI and Justice Department, which effected an immaculate cover-up of the trafficking network.


    Regular Americans would do a much better job for our kids, and our future: we need our Democracy back. Save Our Kids, Save Bernie Sanders, and Save Our Democracy.

  6. Fixing links above:
    Again, look who owns those machines.

    by: Charles M. Young

    Still Evil after All These Years: The Franklin Scandal and Pedophilia in High Places
By Charles M. Young Posted by Dave Lindorff

    The Chart lists The Nation’s Funding Sources. Are those sources the reason that The Nation Lies and Colludes with the abusive, extreme right-wing by denying that Our Democracy has been and is being Stolen by the Abusive, Extreme Right:

    CHART: Foundations that Fund Left-Wing Media

    These projects need your financial support

    — California Exit Polls

    — Ohio Election Integrity Litigation

    — Democracy Counts (Election Audit)

    How the CIA made Google
    by Nafeez Ahmed

    INSURGE INTELLIGENCE, a new crowd-funded investigative journalism project, breaks the exclusive story of how the United States intelligence community funded, nurtured and incubated Google as part of a drive to dominate the world through control of information. Seed-funded by the NSA and CIA, Google was merely the first among a plethora of private sector start-ups co-opted by US intelligence to retain ‘information superiority.’

    The origins of this ingenious strategy trace back to a secret Pentagon-sponsored group, that for the last two decades has functioned as a bridge between the US government and elites across the business, industry, finance, corporate, and media sectors. The group has allowed some of the most powerful special interests in corporate America to systematically circumvent democratic accountability and the rule of law to influence government policies, as well as public opinion in the US and around the world. The results have been catastrophic: NSA mass surveillance, a permanent state of global war, and a new initiative to transform the US military into Skynet.

    Part 2
    Why Google made the NSA
    Inside the secret network behind mass surveillance, endless war, and Skynet—

    part 2

    Mass surveillance is about control. It’s promulgators may well claim, and even believe, that it is about control for the greater good, a control that is needed to keep a cap on disorder, to be fully vigilant to the next threat. But in a context of rampant political corruption, widening economic inequalities, and escalating resource stress due to climate change and energy volatility, mass surveillance can become a tool of power to merely perpetuate itself, at the public’s expense.

    A major function of mass surveillance that is often overlooked is that of knowing the adversary to such an extent that they can be manipulated into defeat. The problem is that the adversary is not just terrorists. It’s you and me. To this day, the role of information warfare as propaganda has been in full swing, though systematically ignored by much of the media.

    Here, INSURGE INTELLIGENCE exposes how the Pentagon Highlands Forum’s co-optation of tech giants like Google to pursue mass surveillance, has played a key role in secret efforts to manipulate the media as part of an information war against the American government, the American people, and the rest of the world: to justify endless war, and ceaseless military expansionism.

    In other words, how can the Pentagon find a way to exploit the information revolution to “control global policy debates,” particularly on “national economic policies”?

    Why is the Pentagon funding research investigating how to exploit people’s “sacred values” to extinguish their capacity for logical reasoning, and enhance their emotional openness to “morally-questionable behavior”?

    Hagel’s departure paved the way for Pentagon officials linked to the Highlands Forum to consolidate government influence. These officials are embedded in a longstanding shadow network of political, industry, media and corporate officials that sit invisibly behind the seat of government, yet literally write its foreign and domestic national security policies whether the administration is Democrat of Republican, by contributing ‘ideas’ and forging government-industry relationships.

    It is this sort of closed-door networking that has rendered the American vote pointless. Far from protecting the public interest or helping to combat terrorism, the comprehensive monitoring of electronic communications has been systematically abused to empower vested interests in the energy, defense, and IT industries.

    No more shadows

    Yet in the long-run, the information imperialists have already failed. This investigation is based entirely on open source techniques, made viable largely in the context of the same information revolution that enabled Google. The investigation has been funded entirely by members of the public, through crowd-funding. And the investigation has been published and distributed outside the circuits of traditional media, precisely to make the point that in this new digital age, centralized top-down concentrations of power cannot overcome the power of people, their love of truth and justice, and their desire to share.

    What are the lessons of this irony? Simple, really: The information revolution is inherently decentralized, and decentralizing. It cannot be controlled and co-opted by Big Brother. Efforts to do so will in the end invariably fail, in a way that is ultimately self-defeating.

    The latest mad-cap Pentagon initiative to dominate the world through control of information and information technologies, is not a sign of the all-powerful nature of the shadow network, but rather a symptom of its deluded desperation as it attempts to ward off the acceleration of its hegemonic decline.

    But the decline is well on its way. And this story, like so many before it, is one small sign that the opportunities to mobilize the information revolution for the benefit of all, despite the efforts of power to hide in the shadows, are stronger than ever.

  7. I do not know the cut-off time for this:


    Election Justice USA
    June 19 at 1:13pm ·

    PLEASE SHARE!! Timing is of the essence to react if you have been stripped of your credentials for the Democratic National Convention!

    Election Justice USA has a team of attorneys who can help you fight this, but you have a limited window.

    Please send an email NOW to with the following:
    * Your full name and address

    * The person’s name, title, office, address and phone of the official involved. Likely the State Director, State Party Officer, etc.

    * Full detailed description of your particular situation

    * The name of the person replacing you (if you have it)
    You will be assigned an attorney who will help to re-instate your credentials. After you consult with an attorney, you will be asked to complete an affidavit form as well.You must contact us right away as the time is limited to dispute this!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you human? *