Dilbert – May 1, 2016

Today’s Dilbert was just to wonderfully appropriate to ignore.

dt160501
http://dilbert.com/strip/2016-05-01

5 thoughts on “Dilbert – May 1, 2016”

  1. The Dilbert comic is on target.
    You mathematicians were too effective. They have stopped Lee Camp’s meme of #ExitPollGate by stopping all exit polls in upcoming primaries which was Beth’s and Richard Charnin’s expertise and work. Now no indirect evidence of exit polls to prove a NO evidence system from these voting machines. What is needed is more and different proof that they cannot stop, plus as with the Dilbert comic, a cultural backlash of the truth.

    via: https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2016/05/19/the-democratic-primaries-no-more-exit-polls-kentucky-and-oregon-recap/
    The Democratic Primaries: No more exit polls, Kentucky and Oregon recap
    Richard Charnin

    In comments:
    With the awful news of no exit polls, I think this comes then at a good time:
    http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2016/05/200pm-water-cooler-5182016.html

    Oregon, Kentucky
    Sanders is considering seeking a recount in Kentucky, where Clinton was clinging to a lead of a half percentage point” [Bloomberg]. Probably wise.

    Everyone encourage Bernie to Recount Kentucky.

    The timing is just right, Now, made available by the best election integrity people whose work can make the difference along with other activists to help us save our democracy, kids, jobs, economy, climate, future and species. Now is the time.

    BERNIE, RECOUNT KENTUCKY. TALK TO BEV HARRIS AND RICHARD CHARNIN, and Beth for Kansas.
    Everyone pass along everywhere new research by Bev Harris, but to Bernie especially so that he will RECOUNT KENTUCKY.
    ………

    http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-1/

    Fraction Magic – Part 1: Votes are being counted as fractions instead of as whole numbers
    By Bev Harris May 12, 2016
    tags COMPANIES, ELECTIONS INDUSTRY, MAKE AND MODEL, RESEARCH

    1 – Summary –
    This report summarizes the results of our review of the GEMS election management system, which counts approximately 25 percent of all votes in the United States. The results of this study demonstrate that a fractional vote feature is embedded in each GEMS application which can be used to invisibly, yet radically, alter election outcomes by pre-setting desired vote percentages to redistribute votes. This tampering is not visible to election observers, even if they are standing in the room and watching the computer. Use of the decimalized vote feature is unlikely to be detected by auditing or canvass procedures, and can be applied across large jurisdictions in less than 60 seconds.

    GEMS vote-counting systems are and have been operated under five trade names: Global Election Systems, Diebold Election Systems, Premier Election Systems, Dominion Voting Systems, and Election Systems & Software, in addition to a number of private regional subcontractors. At the time of this writing, this system is used statewide in Alaska, Connecticut, Georgia, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Utah and Vermont, and for counties in Arizona, (upcoming) California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming. It is also used in Canada.
    snip

    All:
    Part 1: Votes are being counted as fractions instead of as whole numbers
    http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-1


    Part 2: Context, Background, Deeper, Worse
    http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-2


    Part 3: Proof of code
    http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-3

    
Part 4: Presidential race in an entire state switched in four seconds
    http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-4


    Part 5: Masters of the Universe
    http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-5

    
Part 6: Execution capacity – coming –
    http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-6


    Part 7: Solutions and Mitigations – coming –
    http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-7

    …….

    Bernie needs to match up Richard Charnin’s exit polling work, with type of machines used in each state, county and precinct, with the machines found by Bev Harris which were set up to conduct fraud. The timing is just right. Now. We can save each other.
    ………

    http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/welcome_to_1984_20160514

    Chris Hedges
    Welcome to 1984

    Much of the left, Nader argues, especially with the Democratic Party’s blatant rigging of the primaries to deny Bernie Sanders the nomination, grasps that change will come only by building mass movements. This gives the left, at least until these protofascist forces also give up on the political process, a window of opportunity. If we do not seize it, he warns, we may be doomed.

      1. Thanks so much for Richard Charnin’s and your work so effective it changed a long tradition of media fraudulently adjusting exit polls to force a match to those evidence free voting machines. Wow.

        It would be depressing but for the great timing of the research by Bev Harris to fill the void of no exit polls, with her powerful direct evidence of fraud from those machines and the people who own them for their own pillaging profit.
        —–
        Everyone contact Bernie and spread widely. Recount Kentucky. This could change everything.

  2. Wonderful news, if Bernie uses Richard Charnin’s and Bev Harris’ work when looking at those Kentucky voting machines.

    http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/05/bernie-asks-recanvass-kentucky

    Bernie Sanders Requests a Recanvass of the Kentucky Primary
    “He’s in this until every last vote is counted and he’s fighting for every last delegate,” said a campaign spokesman.
    AJ VicensMay 24, 2016 2:09 PM

    Bernie Sanders has formally requested a recanvass of the results of last Tuesday’s Kentucky’s presidential primary, where he lost narrowly statewide to Hillary Clinton, according to the Associated Press. State election officials will review the final tallies from electronic voting machines and absentee ballots cast in the Democratic primary.
    …………

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-kentucky-primary-recount_us_574492dce4b0613b512b6db7

    Bernie Sanders Requests Kentucky Primary Recount
    “The point is transparency,” Sanders’ aide Larry Cohen said on CNN.

    WASHINGTON, May 24 (Reuters) – U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has requested a recount in the close Kentucky presidential primary against front-runner Hillary Clinton, state election officials said on Tuesday.

    The recanvass will take place at all 120 county boards of election on Thursday, according to the Kentucky secretary of state.

    “The point is transparency,” Sanders’ aide Larry Cohen said on CNN.
    …………

    http://www.opednews.com/articles/Sanders-Scolded-For-Callin-by-Kevin-Gosztola-Bernie-Sanders-2016-Presidential-Candidate_DNC-Chairman_Democrats-DNC_Wasserman-Schultz-Debbie-160521-905.html


    Sanders Scolded For Calling Attention To Rigged Primary
    By Kevin Gosztola
    
Reprinted from shadowproof.com by Kevin Gosztola


    But the story is not that Sanders supporters are unruly because Sanders has whipped them into a frenzy over “allegations” of a rigged primary process. It is not that they lack education about the process. Sanders supporters understand very well how the process works and what kind of candidate is supposed to make it to the end. Real and actual evidence of a rigged primary is what fuels such discontent.

    …………

    If this is done well enough, more states should then be reviewed, and we recover our democracy. In which case:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBlQZyTF_LY&feature=player_embedded

    10000 singing Beethoven – Ode an die Freude _ Ode to Joy

  3. No Ode to Joy yet. Kansas did not have a recount as such. So, those voting machines are still in place, and the delegate count the same though a few votes changed.

    Candidates and Voters who support Bernie and his policies, must publicly acknowledge the truth that Beth, Richard Charnin, and Bev Harris have found, regarding the effective statistical analysis of unadjusted exit polls which were finding the indirect evidence of the fraud that was corroborated and confirmed by Bev Harris’s direct evidence discovery of the embedded code fractionalizing voters and votes.
    ……….

    This is not new. So, we have to problem solve for this. Get rid of those voting machines.

    Clint Curtis not only gave an Affidavit, he gave sworn testimony before Congress, so yes, both parties know.

    http://www.bradblog.com/?p=1025

    WHISTLEBLOWER AFFIDAVIT: Programmer Built Vote Rigging Prototype at Republican Congressman’s Request!
    CLAIM: Rep. Tom Feeney (R-FL) Asked Company to Create E-Vote Fraud Software!
    *** A BRAD BLOG EXCLUSIVE! PLEASE CREDIT! ***

    In stunning revelations set to rock the vote from Tallahassee to Capitol Hill — and perhaps even a bit further up Pennsylvania Avenue — a Florida computer programmer has now made remarkable claims in a detailed sworn affidavit, signed this morning and obtained exclusively by The BRAD BLOG!

    – Affidavit in .PDF format –

    The programmer claims that he designed and built a “vote rigging” software program at the behest of then Florida Congressman, now U.S. Congressman, Republican Tom Feeney of Florida’s 24th Congressional District.

    Clint Curtis, 46, claims that he built the software for Feeney in 2000 while working at a sofware design and engineering company in Oviedo, Florida (Feeney’s home district).

    Curtis, in his affidavit, says that as technical advisor and programmer at Yang Enterprises, Inc. (YEI) he was present at company meetings where Feeney was present “on at least a dozen occasions”.

    Feeney, who had run in 1994 as Jeb Bush’s running-mate in his initial unsuccessful bid for Florida Governor, was serving as both corporate counsel and registered lobbyist for YEI during the period that Curtis worked at the company. Feeney was also concurrently serving as a Florida state congressman while performing those services for YEI. Feeney would eventually become Speaker of the Florida House before being elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2002. He is now a member of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee.

    At an October 2000 meeting with Feeney, according to the affidavit and BRAD BLOG interviews with Curtis over the past three days, Feeney inquired whether the company could build a “vote fraud software prototype”.
    snip

    Curtis says that Feeney “was very specific in the design and specifications required for this program.”

    “He detailed, in his own words, that; (a) the program needed to be touch-screen capable (b) the user should be able to trigger the program without any additional equipment (c) the programming to accomplish this needed to stay hidden even if the source code was inspected.”

    Though there was no problem with the first two requirements, Curtis explained to the Congressman that it would be “virtually impossible to hide such code written to change the voting results if anyone is able to review the uncompiled source code”

    Nonetheless, he was asked at the meeting by Mrs. Yang to build the prototype anyway.

    Curtis, “a life-long Republican” at the time, claims that it was his initial belief that Feeney’s interest was in trying to stop Democrats from using “such a program to steal an election”. Curtis had assumed that Feeney, “wanted to be able to detect and prevent that if it occurred.”

    Upon delivery of the software design and documentation on CD to Mrs. Yang, Curtis again explained to her that it would be impossible to hide routines created to manipulate the vote if anybody would be able to inspect the precompiled source code.

    Mrs. Yang then told him, “You don’t understand, in order to get the contract we have to hide the manipulation in the source code. This program is needed to control the vote in South Florida.” [emphasis in affidavit]

    Mrs. Yang then took the CD containing the software from Curtis, reportedly for later delivery to Feeney.

    In other meetings with Feeny prior to the 2000 elections, it became clear to Curtis that Feeney had plans to suppress the vote in strong Democratic precincts. In the affidavit, Curtis claims that in those meetings Feeney had “bragged that he had already implemented ‘exclusion lists’ to reduce the ‘black vote’.” Feeney also mentioned that “proper placement of police patrols could further reduce the black vote by as much as 25%.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you human? *